Henri Cartier-Bresson’s birthday

Bastille Day Ball, Place de la Bastille square, Paris, France, 1952. Bresson taught many of us how to see everyday scenes as not so ordinary. It all had to do with his ability not to see the “subject” but the subjects. There’s been no one quite like him. He could do his art in all situations, wherever he found himself. Truly an extraordinary artist.


Jim Harrison poem: River IV

Were it not for the new moon

my sky would collapse tonight

so fed by the waters of memory.

The last line in River IV from Songs of Unreason by Jim Harrison

The first five lines of Love from Songs of Unreason by Jim Harrison:

Love is raw as freshly cut meat,

mean as a beetle on the track of dung.

It is the Celtic dog that ate its tail in a dream.

It chooses us as a blizzard chooses a mountain.

It’s seven knocks on the door you pray not to answer.


Clive James on William Empson

Here is a short remembrance by Clive James on William Empson that was posted on Poetry.


What word is this?

Abandoned church near Newton, Texas; photography by Roy Hamric


Minding My Time

Minding My Time

Awash in mind time.

Mind’s always mattering:

sensations, feelings

always forming.

Words always mattering

in Universe of Matter––

That’s all

(not really for Roy & Laddawan

and the Thai band playing

Eric Clapton).

Not to mind called self

that’s just the go-between

for no-body.

Big Self is every thing.

Knows like the bone in your

eye every thing’s just co-

existing meaning matter

of meaning-ness.

Right now

at 1:18 a.m.

as a tiny candle lantern rises

golden in the night sky

like a star.


Name it

I call it A Rock in the Cosmos,

a rock on the ground with no name.

But let’s be real. It is a rock,

not a rock-on-the-ground metaphor,

not a descriptive target: a white, porous

igneous outcast atop a scaly wind-blown

nob here in the cowboy Big Bend

in mysterious Springtime. It

stimulates. Does it recognize

something of its firey history

or the bottom of the swaying Sea,

or a bit of a bright Star – its ancestry?

No matter, of itself it is enough.

Ok, let’s be real, it is a rock

on the ground in the Cosmos.

It is white, porous, igneous.

The rock can never know

the rising Sun, the waning Moon,

the ten thousand waves, but there

is this rock in my mind, too,

not on the ground, and this

mysterious non-stop, air-like chorus

accompanying all this and more.

 

 


A look that opens up thought

John Updike the young novelist

This picture of John Updike as a young man has all the qualities that are given to a portrait of a person caught in a “look” that dominates the traditional values of portraiture. The expression seems friendly, but is really closed, which sets off a search on the viewer’s part to understand what’s being shared. Is it satisfaction, is it a secret thought which at that moment the photographer could never grasp, is it pride, is it smugness (“I’m the new American Proust and I know it and the public doesn’t.”), is the photographer a woman bringing out Updike’s sexual curiosity, is he simply lost in a characteristic expression that really means nothing, is he thinking, “This picture will be known as my ‘author smokes a cigarette picture?’,” is it the hyper-curiosity that accompanied Updike’s grasp of the world before him, and we could go on and on. In short, it transcends common portraiture because we can never understand what it is revealing– it raises questions that provide no answers. What it emphatically says is there appears to be a blank piece of paper in the foreground and many books in the background, a worthy metaphor for his life.


Songs of Unreason

Jim Harrison’s newest poetry book, “Songs of Unreason,” is even more moving that his recent “Saving Daylight,” and “In Search of Small Gods.” The poet in winter, yes, but his mind is still on fire, the fire of recurring youth, and a blending of flowing memories of the last moment and  moments far past reborn. When I told my friend Red Pine I was getting the book soon, he said, “I think it is his best ever.” Red Pine knows whereof he speaks, being the translator of Cold Mountain and Stonehouse. Harrison is up there with the discursive giants of poetry. He has uncovered himself as few poets can do. A true voyager between the inner and outer world of mind. Here’s a sample:

Back Into Memory

The tears roll up my cheek

and the car backs itself south.

I pull away from the girl and reverse

through the door without looking.

In defiance of the body the mind

does as it wishes, the crushed bones

of life reknit themselves in sunlight.

In the night the body melts itself down

to the void before birth

before you swam the river into being.

Death takes care of itself like a lightning

stroke and the following thunder

is the veil being rent in twain.

The will to live can pass away

like that raven colliding with the Sun.

In age we tilt toward home.

We want to sleep a long time, not forever,

but then to sleep a long time becomes forever.


Sounds like Wittgenstein, but isn’t

Nothing Is Always Absolutely So

This came to me today on the Oxford Dictionary’s Word of the Day , and is associated with Theodore H. Sturgeon (1918–85, born Edward Hamilton Waldo), a U.S. science fiction writer.

Very rich in multiple meanings, it speaks in that fine musical way beyond concreteness of language, moving on into another unfixed place in our mind.

 


Clive James on Wittgenstein

Here’s to Clive James. Call it a herd, a brood, a pack, a platoon, a circle, a gang, but each has a person others look to in order to know where it’s at. Where it is at: what’s really happening, going on. James is one of these people. In his recent essay collection, Cultural Amnesia, he writes about Wittgenstein. You can wade through many books on LW and not find what’s in his seven-page essay. Just one example:

The Wittengenstein that matters to a writer might be mistaken for his meaning by ordinary readers, but he can never be mistaken for his poetic quality, which is apparent even in his plainest statement. The precision of his language we can take for granted, and perhaps he should more often have done the same. His true and unique precision was in registering pre-verbal states of mind. In The Blue and Brown Books (p. 173), he proposes a “noticing, seeing, conceiving” process that happens before it can be described in words. That, indeed, is the only way of describing it. It sounds very like the kind of poetic talent that we are left to deal with after we abandon the notion––as we must––that poetic talent is mere verbal ability. “What we call ‘understanding a statement’ has, in many cases, a much greater similarity to understanding a musical theme than we might be inclined to think” (p. 167). But he doesn’t want us to think about music as a mechanism to convey a feeling: joy, for example. “Music conveys to us itself ” (p. 178). So when we read a sentence as if it were a musical theme, the music doesn’t convey a separate sense that compounds with the written meaning. We get the feeling of a musical theme because the sentence means something. I thought he was getting very close to the treasure chamber when he wrote this. In 1970, reading The Blue and Brown Books every day in the Copper Kettle in Cambridge, I made detailed transcriptions in my journal every few minutes. It didn’t occur to me at the time that his prose was doing to me exactly what he was in the process of analyzing. It sounded like music because he was so exactly right.